One of the Vistage Chairs I work with recently expressed concern that he might be “over-chairing.” The term caught my attention as it seemed to be another name for over-managing, over-parenting, or any number of other over-lording situations.
That set me to reflecting on the behaviors I have observed over the last couple of decades of working with Chairs, leaders and parents and there seems to be common traits and mindsets driving them. Most common of all is the often delusionalbelief that tightly controlling the conversations, processes and relationships will produce desired high-quality outcomes. Generally, this assumption is false. It is driven by your needs versus the recipients’ wishes and points-of-view.
The delusional dimension is that you can be comfortable in your belief that you are doing your best and assuring the best outcomes, even in the face of data to the contrary. In the case of children, (especially teens), the contrary outcomes may be multiple while you continue to assert your right to say how it should go. Good luck with that!
So what’s really going on and what is actually being assured? First, you can continue to ignore what’s before your eyes and feel comfortable that you are doing your best. Second, you can avoid the discomfort that your best is not necessarily producing your desired outcomes. Third, you can avoid the discomfort or downright fear of having to "dance with the unknown” by including the other party as an equal partner in solutions, strategies and processes that get implemented. It’s unknown since you lose control of the outcome and probably have little to no idea of how to get to a productive outcome in such a dynamic.
Another discomforting dimension is that your “shame," or “original wound” will jump up and the seemingly real threat that you will be judged as your own personal version of worthless or incompetent.
A powerful antidote that will give you the capacity to dive headlong into the unknown is our Productive Dialogue Zone (more about this in our book, "Accelerate"). Working with that approach, you will be required to articulate your vision or desired outcome for the conversation, summon the courage to go forward as you let go of how and when, be sure you are staying connected or in relationship with the other, and also challenging or confronting the issue(s) as you see it. Notice I said confronting the issue(s), not the person. Confronting the person has them withdraw from the relationship and you will have lost your ability to partner in producing the best possible outcome.
Study the model, summon the courage, and start letting go. Practice on easier challenges until you gain facility with engaging in Productive Interactions. Enjoy new and unexpected outcomes.

As I write this, we are sailing a 28 mile crossing In the British Virgin Islands on a beautiful day with a steady wind and modest seas in a boat appropriately named "Escape Yourself." The length of the crossing and the steadiness of the sea conditions give me pause to consider the name of the boat assigned to us.
At first I notice the immediate ways to read/hear the name:
It
Results-oriented leaders, particularly in our culture, are often driven by their own needs and wants. However, real power comes from providing the leadership that results from shared vision and shared focus.
A case in point, one of our clients was recently promoted to CEO. She has been asking how she can get her colleagues to want to work for her so she can lead the company to achieving its exciting vision. Suzanne, one of 2130’s co-founders, pointed out that the answer to her question is very unlikely to give her much access to the outcomes she is seeking. A much higher leverage conversation deals with focusing on enrolling everyone in focusing on the shared vision and unleashing their own creativity and self-generated accountability to fulfill the shared vision together.
Have you ever noticed that your mind is chock full of running monologues that are instant, automatic, and largely unexamined? These “thoughts”arise from what we refer to as your “Mental File Cabinet” and require no effort on your part to occur. They are patterns of thinking that started forming when you were very young and now run on auto-pilot.
The problem is, if you haven’t learned to self-observe, these thoughts will function as very unintended biases to both your listening and your speaking. These biases will very likely give you the outcomes that currently frustrate you, or even create upsets in others.
One of the most common challenges I see among leaders is unwillingness to have difficult conversations. It is a very common issue for leaders to be unable to be direct with others about failures to perform and their roles in problems. I seldom see swift, effective feedback that communicates disappointment with another person's behavior. The trouble is, none of us grow without pain.
The thing is, people are far more resilient than it seems. In fact, people aspiring to leadership will actively seek direct feedback, even if it hurts. I don't have specific data about exactly what stops leaders from being direct, but after working with them for so many years my observation is that the issue is more about fear of being rejected, abandoned, or simply not knowing how to proceed that stops leaders from being as direct as they could be.
John Dewey said that “a problem well-stated is a problem half-solved.” My correlate to that is "a problem mis-named is a problem stuck!"
As discussed in my recent blog series, all you really have to effect your leadership is your thinking, listening and speaking. An essential ingredient of growing yourself and your leadership is gaining self-awareness and the ability to self-observe and intervene while you are in the heat of the action. If you can’t self-observe, you can’t hear/see how you are thinking and communicating, and whether you are even connecting at all.If you can't self-observe, you will be unable to give yourself a new brain assignment that self-corrects your instant, automatic and largely unexamined reactions.
In our work, we invite clients to consider their brain as a “Mental File Cabinet”which stores every experience from every one of our five senses at every moment. The catch in that is that you have all sorts of filters, biases, and predispositions that severely limit what gets into your Mental File Cabinet. Further, your Mental File Cabinet has strange and unique filing procedures and cross-referencing.
It seems to me that the bulk of what passes for leadership development currently is actually training to improve your ability to be someone else. By that I mean training to fit yourself into what the world seems to want. The issue isn’t confined to just leadership training. Reading resumes has become almost worthless because counselors have taught most people to write them in a way that claims credit for all sorts of spectacular results and uses lots of key words that show up in headhunter searches.
Author, speaker and workshop leader David Whyte offers the following perspective: “…human beings have never had the luxury of choosing between an untouched and interior foundational self and the necessities and often overwhelming revelations of the outer world.”
David Whyte asks the beautiful question, “what if that story I have been telling myself is not true anymore?”Complementary to that question, I often reflect on what’s available in my life as a result of having given up old stories, most of which had me as a victim at the center at the time I told the story the first time.
My wife Suzanne and I recently had the extraordinary opportunity to experience a marvelous “payoff”from having given up our various stories about the people we were previously married to, the events around the end of those marriages, and the other people who were involved in various ways at the time.
Effective leadership requires intentional
Last week
In developing your leadership effectiveness you really only have 3 areas to impact - your thinking, your listening and your speaking. Since your thoughts shape your speaking and listening, that is your key leverage point, so let’s start there.
Two recent events have reminded me of how completely our thoughts dominate and shape our experience and that, in turn, controls our leadership and relationship effectiveness. Before getting to the events let’s set some context. When delving into the arena of thoughts we like to talk about it by saying that each of us has what amounts to a Mental File Cabinet. Several characteristics of the ‘Mental File Cabinet” are:
Leadership and the qualities of good leaders are often debated and there is no single definition on which everyone seems to agree. Let’s narrow the focus to the role of the CEO.
We really like our colleague
Traditionally, high value has been placed on splitting or compartmentalizing “personal life” and work. There has been pressure in the workplace to behave rationally, productively and with focus – day in and day out. The message has been to shut out personal circumstances, emotions, and life experiences and be task and accomplishment oriented. For leaders, the expectation has been to be driven and a driving force for others, relentlessly pushing the business and the team forward.
Within this framework there has been no room for emotions, emotional energy, and in some ways real humanity. This has been part of the gender divide in the work place – for many years women were considered too emotional to be leaders.
Well of course it IS about football - competition, pride, and all that goes with it. That's the simple explanation, but it’s also about a phenomenon – within the sport and the local community.
Avoiding life’s essentially chaotic and messy nature seems to be a preoccupation of many leaders. The question is - why? Underneath it all the truth about this is something that none of us really wants to face or admit. The reality is if you are willing to be present to the messiness and take appropriate action based on the conditions in which you actually find yourself, you will be uncomfortable quite often and also probably experience feeling vulnerable.
I was recently reminded of this subject while watching a TED video by Glennon Doyle Melton entitled “
How does a leader look out for the well-being of each individual in an organization and yet assure the success of the whole venture? It is often seemingly a nearly impossible challenge.
"What's good for the goose is good for the gander" is a very old English saying that basically says that what is good or fair for one person is good or fair for the other. While this may be excellent wisdom regarding individuals, it doesn't always work well when viewing the individual versus the whole gaggle of geese. An extreme example is when a predator grabs one goose, the rest of the flock is able to escape to safety. Although it didn't go well for the individual goose the flock was safe.